南京大學碩士研究生入學考試國際經濟法

伊娣

南京大學1997年碩士研究生入學考試國際經濟法

一.名詞解釋
國家豁免原則.互惠原則.國際貿易術語解釋通則.共同海損.關稅稅則.關稅配額.GATS.
權責發生制
二.論述題
1.簡要說明中國公司與美國公司之間的國際貨物買賣關系要受到哪些法律的調整
2.簡述進口許可證制的作用與特點,并具體說明,在我國是否所有的商品的進口都需要經過
許可
3.什么是國際投資中的投資措施,各國對此都規定了哪些相關的國際稅則
4.試述國際投資中合營企業的概念,類型與特點.并簡要說明中外合資經營企業與中外合作
經營企業的主要區別
三.案例分析
1.中國與加拿大都是<聯合國貨物銷售合同公約>的締約國.中國某輕工業開發公司與加拿
大某公司簽定了一份關于買賣3臺新聞紙機的合同,總價款約300萬美元,合同簽定后.加拿
大某公司一直不交貨,該開發公司就從其他來源購買了相同規格的新聞紙機作為替代物,
但買入價比合同規定的價格高出50%,該開發公司要求加拿大某公司賠償這50%的差價損失
,請回答:
1)中國公司是否有權撤消原合同而購買替代物?為什么?
2)中國公司的損害賠償要求是否合理?為什么?
2.中國某土產公司對新加坡出口紅棗一批,國外開來的信用證規定為三級品質,交貨時,中
方公司因庫存三級紅棗缺貨,就改裝二級貨,并在商業發票上注明:二級紅棗,價格照舊,仍
按原定的三級貨價什收,中方公司原以為所交貨物品級較原定的為高，而價格不變,對方
公司不會有異議.但是,買方在收到上述單據后,聲稱該貨系作轉售他人之用,因而無法接受
中方所交的二級貨,還認為中方公司未按合同規定交
貨,因而提出索賠要求.
請回答:1)對方公司是否有權拒收貨物并提出索賠要求?為什么？
2)中方公司能否從對方開證行收到貨款?為什么?

.南京大學1996年碩士研究生入學考試國際經濟法

名詞解釋
非歧視原則.CFR.單證嚴格相符原則.特別提款權.單獨海損.關稅減讓原則.原產地規則.
注冊資本
二.論述題
1.試述國際經濟法的調整對象與法律特征
2.簡述國際經濟法的主要法律淵源,并請舉例說明之
3.如何理解國際貨物買賣中的權利擔保原則
4.試述投資保護協定的法律含義與主要內容
三.案例題(中文回答)
INTRODUCTION
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must
answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles
of international trade law to support your argument
Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American
company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD
1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese
company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market
has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed
back an acceptance.
Questions:
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per
ton to USD 2,500 per ton?
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese
company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer?
Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B
(an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity
,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between
them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked
B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter
was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication.
So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on
.So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the
goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was
under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a
formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of
China and international practice
Questions:
1)What is the main issue in this case?
2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the ju
dge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve
the dispute?
南京大學2000年碩士研究生入學考試國際經濟法



一.名詞解釋
TRIMS.投資保護協定.外商投資股份有限公司.股權式合營企業."根本違反合同"
適航責任.國際許可證協議.替代國制度
二.論述題
1.根據我國法律規定,簡要說明外商投資企業在我國取得土地使用權的主要方式及其不用特
點
2.簡述國際貨幣基金組織的法律地位和國際貨幣基金協定的基本原則
3.<1990年國際貿易術語解釋通則>的主要特點是什么
4.試述關稅在GATT中的法律地位
三。案例題
INTRODUCTION
Aswer in Chinese the following questions after you read the cases.You must a
nswer them precisely to the point.Put forward the various basic principles o
f the laws to support your argument.
Case 1
In June 1990, a Chinese trading company concluded a joint venture contract w
ith a foreign industrial company.Under the contract,the two parties woukd mak
e joint investment to establish Grant Hotel of New Century with the
total investment of USDTen million and registered capital of USD five milli
on.Each party must contribute 50% of registered capital.
After the approval of joint venture contract,the Chinese party performed the
obligation of contributing capital.However,the foreign side failed to contr
ibute any capital by the end of December.When the construction of major buil
ding of hotel was completed in Augest 1991,the foreign party remained failur
e to contribute capital,which resulted in the great loss of the Chinese canc
ellation of the joint venture contract.At the same time,the Chinese side sugb
mitted the disp
ute to the arbitration body in Beijing according to the arbitration clause i
n the contract,claiming for damages from the foreign side.
Question:
1)Did the Chinese company have the right to cancel the joint venture contrac
t/Why?
2)How to deal with the dispute concerning the loss or damage?(Suppose you we
re an arbitrator of the arbitration body,please give your opinion to the cas
e)

Case 2
A Chinese company and a Hong Kong company reached a joint venture agreement
to establish a hotel at the end of 1989 in China.The total investment contri
buted ty the two parties equaled $2 million and each party ,respectively,sha
red 50% equity of the joint venture,In July 1990,the Hong Kong company declar
ed bankruptcy in Hong Kong.Later,the Hong Kong c
ompany entered into a new agreement with the third party for assignment(tran
sferring)of its equity of the joint venture to the latter so as to repay a d
ebt from the assignment.The assignment agreement was submitted to the local
government for approval.Having discovered what had happened,the Chinese comp
any requested the Hong Kong company to cancel the assignment agreement and pr
oposed to receive the Hong Kong party's equity in the same conditions.
After such request and proposal were refused by the Hong Kong company,the Ch
inese company filed a lawsuit against the Hong Kong company.
Questions:
1)Was the said assignment agreement effective under Chinese law?Why?
2)What was the right of the Chinese party in the matter of Hong Kong party's
equity assignment under Chinese law?

se company have the right to cancel the joint venture contrac
t/Why?
2)How to deal with the dispute concerning the loss or damage?(Suppose you we
re an arbitrator of the arbitration body,please give your opinion to the cas
e)

Case 2
A Chinese company and a Hong Kong company reached a joint venture agreement
to establish a hotel at the end of 1989 in China.The total investment contri
buted ty the two parties equaled $2 million and each party ,respectively,sha
red 50% equity of the joint venture,In July 1990,the Hong Kong company declar
ed bankruptcy in Hong Kong.Later,the Hong Kong c
ompany entered into a new agreement with the third party for assignment(tran
sferring)of its equity of the joint venture to the latter so as to repay a d
ebt from the assignment.The assignment agreement was submitted to the local
government for approval.Having discovered what had happened,the Chinese comp
any requested the Hong Kong company to cancel the assignment agreement and pr
oposed to receive the Hong Kong party's equity in the same conditions.
After such request and proposal were refused by the Hong Kong company,the Ch
inese company filed a lawsuit against the Hong Kong company.
Questions:
1)Was the said assignment agreement effective under Chinese law?Why?
2)What was the right of the Chinese party in the matter of Hong Kong party's
equity assignment under Chinese law?
南京大學2005年國際經濟法綜合考研試題

一、名詞解釋
外貿登記制，OFII，造法性條約，調查，域外取證，直接適用的法律
二、論述題
1、如何認識國際司法判例
2、試述《維也納條約法公約》有關保留的接受與反對的規定
3、我國有關貨物進出口管理的基本原則
4、試述我國反傾銷措施類型及含義
5、承認與執行外國法院判決的條件
6、試述有關識別沖突的學說，你對于我國有關立法的建議及理由





無意間找到的，大家分享一下吧。
ps   是在這個http://www.**/Articles.aspx?f=18885 看到的  可以去看看  有很多專業     不好意思我只總結了一下 我喜歡的專業，可以去看看 也許有你們需要的，不過都是試題了。